Let the People Decide: Why Garfield Heights Should Elect Its Council President
Here’s something most Garfield Heights residents don’t know: you don’t get to vote for your City Council President.
Under the current city charter — in place since 1956 — the Council President is not elected by the people. Instead, the seven council members choose one of their own. It’s an internal appointment with no direct input from the nearly 30,000 residents the council represents.
That needs to change.
How It Works Now
After each municipal election, the seven council members meet and select a Council President from among themselves. No public vote. No campaign. No opportunity for residents to weigh in.
The Council President:
- Presides over all council meetings — controlling the agenda, discussion, and pace of legislation
- Succeeds the mayor if the mayor’s seat is vacated — stepping into executive power without a citywide vote
- Represents the voice of council to the public, media, and other government bodies
- Wields significant influence over which ordinances get heard, tabled, or buried
The Council President is the second most powerful position in city government — and residents have absolutely no say in who fills it.
| Position | Elected By | Accountable To |
|---|---|---|
| Mayor | All voters (citywide) | All voters |
| Council Members | Ward voters | Ward voters |
| Municipal Judges | All voters (district-wide) | All voters |
| Council President | 6 council colleagues | 6 council colleagues |
Every elected office answers to voters — except the Council President
Why That’s a Problem
- Political deals can determine who gets the presidency, rather than qualifications or public trust
- Dissenting voices are less likely to be elevated — members choose someone who won’t challenge the status quo
- Accountability is diluted — residents can’t vote the president out of the presidency, only out of their ward seat
- Mayoral succession is undemocratic — if the mayor leaves office, an internally selected president becomes the city’s chief executive without a single citywide vote
The Succession Problem
Under the charter, if the mayor’s seat is vacated, the Council President becomes mayor. A person who was never elected citywide — chosen by six colleagues — could become the chief executive of a city of 30,000 people, controlling the budget, directing departments, and making decisions that affect every resident.
If we elect the Council President directly, we ensure that the person next in line for the mayor’s office has been vetted and chosen by the entire community.
The Democratic Alternative
Amend the charter to make the Council President an elected position:
Option 1: At-Large Election — The Council President is elected citywide by all voters, serving as both a council member and president with a mandate from the entire city.
Option 2: Public Ballot Designation — Council members are still elected by ward, but voters also cast a separate ballot for which council member should serve as president.
Either option puts the decision where it belongs: in the hands of the voters.
How to Make It Happen
- Council resolution — A two-thirds vote places the amendment on the ballot
- Citizen petition — 10% of qualified electors (~2,000–2,500 signatures) forces the question onto the ballot
The final decision, as always, belongs to the voters.
What You Can Do
- Ask your council representative if they support a public vote for Council President
- Attend city council meetings and raise this issue on the record
- Support a charter review — the 1956 charter is 70 years old and overdue for modernization
- Share this article — most residents don’t know they have no say in this position
Every other elected office in Garfield Heights is chosen by the voters.
The Council President should be too.
It’s time to let the people decide.
Sources: Garfield Heights City Charter (1956), Ohio Revised Code §705.72, Ohio Municipal League, Ballotpedia.
![]()
Use your browser's "Save as PDF" option when the print dialog opens